Meta Tests Spoiler Feature on Threads

Meta is testing a way to hide spoilers on Threads, according to a new post from Mark Zuckerberg. This new feature allows users to obscure text or images, making them viewable only after being tapped or clicked.

How the Spoiler Feature Works

In the current version being tested, users can highlight their chosen text or tap on an image and then select “Mark spoiler” to hide it. The Threads app includes a swirling particle animation that covers the text and images before it flitters away when tapped.

Two screenshots of the new spoiler tool in Threads, showing how you select text to hide and what hidden text looks like.
Two screenshots of the new spoiler tool in Threads, demonstrating the selection and hidden text.

Purpose of the Feature

Meta suggests that this feature is being added to facilitate discussions about ongoing shows without the risk of accidentally revealing spoilers. The platform has cultivated a growing community of users who utilize Threads to discuss various media. However, the algorithmic feed can sometimes lead to spoilers being presented unexpectedly.

Currently, not many social media platforms outside of Reddit offer a way to obscure spoilers. Users often resort to general moderation tools, such as muting specific words or phrases, to avoid learning plot details before they have had a chance to watch a new movie or show.

Availability and Recent Changes

The new spoiler feature does not appear to be widely available yet. However, it is part of a series of changes that Meta has been experimenting with in Threads over the past few months. One of the most significant updates has been the introduction of a dedicated direct messaging (DM) inbox. Previously, messaging someone on Threads redirected users to Instagram DMs, but Meta is now testing a separate Threads DM inbox in Hong Kong, Thailand, and Argentina.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/threads-is-testing-out-a-way-to-hide-spoilers-182346919.html?src=rss.

Source: Original Article